Merge remote-tracking branch 'ui/master'
This commit is contained in:
commit
4530967b6b
70 files changed
+10951
-8
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Naive DPLL solver for propositional logic adapted from
|
||||
* https://github.com/tammet/logictools
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Origianl code by Tanel Tammet released under the MIT license.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Check whether a clause set is satisfiable or contradictory, using a naive
|
||||
* implementation of the dpll (Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland) procedure
|
||||
* combining truth table search with the resolution-like unit propagation.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The standard pure-literal rule is not implemented in this naive version,
|
||||
* since it is not really crucial for the algorithm.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The code is very similar to the pure table solver, except we use a
|
||||
* unit-propagating, derived-varlist-returing satisfiableAt.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
"use strict";
|
||||
|
||||
function satisfiableAt(clauses, varVals, varnr, val) {
|
||||
if (varnr !== 0) varVals[varnr] = val;
|
||||
|
||||
const propRes = unitPropagate(clauses, varVals);
|
||||
if (propRes === 1) {
|
||||
varVals[varnr] = 0;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// if result false (-1) unitPropagate restores the varVals state itself
|
||||
if (propRes === -1) {
|
||||
varVals[varnr] = 0;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// find next unassigned var to split
|
||||
let nextVar = 0;
|
||||
for (let i = 1; i < varVals.length; i++) {
|
||||
if (varVals[i] === 0) {
|
||||
nextVar = i;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (nextVar === 0) throw new Error("Error in satisfiableAt");
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
satisfiableAt(clauses, varVals, nextVar, 1) ||
|
||||
satisfiableAt(clauses, varVals, nextVar, -1)
|
||||
)
|
||||
// not necessary to restore split var: search is halted anyway
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// restore split var
|
||||
varVals[nextVar] = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
// restore derived vars
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < propRes.length; i++) varVals[propRes[i]] = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Check whether clauses are satisfiable under the varVals assignment, without
|
||||
* search.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Iterate through all clauses and check whether
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - all literals in the clause are assigned false: undo derived units (set
|
||||
* values in varVals to 0) and return false immediately
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - a clause contains a literal assigned true: skip further actions on this
|
||||
* clause
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - a single literal in the clause is unassigned, all the rest are assigned
|
||||
* false: derive this literal as a unit clause.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In case at least one literal is derived during the process above, iterate
|
||||
* the whole process until no more new literals are derived.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1: all clauses were assigned true, hence the clause set is satisfiable.
|
||||
* The whole search will terminate after that.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* -1: clause set is contradictory. Derived units have been restored.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* a list of derived variables: the status of the clause set is
|
||||
* undetermined. The values of variables on the list will be restored (set to
|
||||
* 0) during backtracking.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
function unitPropagate(clauses, varVals) {
|
||||
// all vars with a value derived in the forthcoming main loop
|
||||
const derivedVars = [];
|
||||
|
||||
// the main loop is run, deriving new unit clauses, until either:
|
||||
// - the clause set is detected to be unsatisfiable
|
||||
// - the clause set is detected to be satisfiable
|
||||
// - there are no more derived unit clauses
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
let allClausesFound = true; // set to false if we find an undetermined clause
|
||||
const derivedQueue = []; // derived units (literals) during one iteration
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < clauses.length; i++) {
|
||||
const clause = clauses[i];
|
||||
let clauseVal = 0;
|
||||
let unassignedCount = 0; // count unassigned vars in clause
|
||||
let unassignedLit = 0; // 0 means none found for this clause
|
||||
|
||||
for (let j = 0; j < clause.length; j++) {
|
||||
const lit = clause[j];
|
||||
let nr, polarity;
|
||||
if (lit < 0) {
|
||||
nr = 0 - lit;
|
||||
polarity = -1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
nr = lit;
|
||||
polarity = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (varVals[nr] === polarity) {
|
||||
clauseVal = 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
} else if (varVals[nr] === 0) {
|
||||
unassignedCount++;
|
||||
unassignedLit = lit;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (clauseVal === 1) continue; // clause is subsumed
|
||||
|
||||
// clause is not subsumed by varVals
|
||||
if (unassignedCount === 0) {
|
||||
for (let j = 0; j < derivedVars.length; j++)
|
||||
varVals[derivedVars[j]] = 0; // restore derived
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
} else if (unassignedCount === 1) {
|
||||
// unassignedLit is a derived literal
|
||||
derivedQueue.push(unassignedLit);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (unassignedCount !== 0) allClausesFound = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// if all clauses were subsumed or all the variables in a clause had a value
|
||||
// no need to restore varVals: whole search finished
|
||||
if (allClausesFound) return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
// in case there are any derived units present, store to varVals and
|
||||
// iterate the main loop
|
||||
if (derivedQueue.length === 0) break;
|
||||
|
||||
// some units were derived: iterate the main loop
|
||||
for (let j = 0; j < derivedQueue.length; j++) {
|
||||
const lit = derivedQueue[j];
|
||||
let nr, polarity;
|
||||
if (lit < 0) {
|
||||
nr = 0 - lit;
|
||||
polarity = -1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
nr = lit;
|
||||
polarity = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
varVals[nr] = polarity;
|
||||
derivedVars.push(nr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return derivedVars;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function naiveDpll(clauses, maxvarnr) {
|
||||
// variable values are 0 if not set, 1 if positive, -1 if negative
|
||||
const varVals = new Int32Array(maxvarnr + 1);
|
||||
return satisfiableAt(clauses, varVals, 0, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
exports.naiveDpll = naiveDpll;
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user